<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1101 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404609</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner, a Merchant Exporter, should not be denied benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) due to a procedural lapse of not marking &#039;Y&#039; in the shipping bills. Emphasizing the scheme&#039;s aim to promote exports and interpret procedural simplifications progressively, the court quashed the communication denying benefits and directed the respondents to issue a &#039;No Objection Certificate&#039; for the petitioner to avail MEIS benefits within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:43:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1101 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404609</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner, a Merchant Exporter, should not be denied benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) due to a procedural lapse of not marking &#039;Y&#039; in the shipping bills. Emphasizing the scheme&#039;s aim to promote exports and interpret procedural simplifications progressively, the court quashed the communication denying benefits and directed the respondents to issue a &#039;No Objection Certificate&#039; for the petitioner to avail MEIS benefits within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>