https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404606 The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the attachment notice for coercive tax recovery under the Puducherry Value Added Tax Act, 2007, was premature. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the full appeal period before any recovery action can commence. Consequently, the court ordered the respondent to lift the bank attachment immediately, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the appeal process. The writ petition was allowed, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs. en-us Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404606 The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the attachment notice for coercive tax recovery under the Puducherry Value Added Tax Act, 2007, was premature. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the full appeal period before any recovery action can commence. Consequently, the court ordered the respondent to lift the bank attachment immediately, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the appeal process. The writ petition was allowed, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404606