https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293700 The Supreme Court held that the Respondents were legally obliged to pay interest, penal interest, and penalty for delayed installment payments of commercial plots acquired through auction. The Court emphasized that the Respondents had accepted the plots on an "as is where is" basis and were aware of the conditions at the time of the auction. The High Court's decision exempting the Respondents from these charges was overturned, affirming PUDA's right to claim the specified charges. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments, dismissed the writ petitions, and allowed the appeals, with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293700 The Supreme Court held that the Respondents were legally obliged to pay interest, penal interest, and penalty for delayed installment payments of commercial plots acquired through auction. The Court emphasized that the Respondents had accepted the plots on an "as is where is" basis and were aware of the conditions at the time of the auction. The High Court's decision exempting the Respondents from these charges was overturned, affirming PUDA's right to claim the specified charges. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments, dismissed the writ petitions, and allowed the appeals, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293700