<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 28 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24745</link>
    <description>The court held that unabsorbed depreciation of a registered firm, if not fully set off in partners&#039; assessments, should be brought back and carried forward in the firm&#039;s assessment for the following year as per Section 32(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court unanimously ruled in favor of the assessee-registered firm, allowing the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against the firm&#039;s income in subsequent years, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s argument.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:02:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 28 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24745</link>
      <description>The court held that unabsorbed depreciation of a registered firm, if not fully set off in partners&#039; assessments, should be brought back and carried forward in the firm&#039;s assessment for the following year as per Section 32(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court unanimously ruled in favor of the assessee-registered firm, allowing the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against the firm&#039;s income in subsequent years, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s argument.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>