<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404569</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an ITAT order for Assessment Year 2014-15, upholding the genuineness of high-seas sales and cash transactions. The Court found no substantial question of law, supported the ITAT&#039;s reliance on documentary evidence, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions regarding additions under Section 68. The judgment emphasized the significance of documentary proof and governmental approvals in establishing transaction genuineness, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404569</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an ITAT order for Assessment Year 2014-15, upholding the genuineness of high-seas sales and cash transactions. The Court found no substantial question of law, supported the ITAT&#039;s reliance on documentary evidence, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions regarding additions under Section 68. The judgment emphasized the significance of documentary proof and governmental approvals in establishing transaction genuineness, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>