<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1042 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404550</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Tax Commissioner to determine whether the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2005 or the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 applied to a work contract post-GST implementation. A decision was required within one month, with no enforcement action against the petitioner until then. The judgment aimed to resolve tax regime ambiguity promptly, emphasizing the importance of clarity in tax obligations and protecting public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1042 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404550</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Tax Commissioner to determine whether the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2005 or the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 applied to a work contract post-GST implementation. A decision was required within one month, with no enforcement action against the petitioner until then. The judgment aimed to resolve tax regime ambiguity promptly, emphasizing the importance of clarity in tax obligations and protecting public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>