<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty under section 271(1)(c) unsustainable due to vague notice, inadvertent error in computing book profit, and voluntary correction by the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was ordered to be deleted, emphasizing the necessity of clear charges in penalty proceedings and acknowledging the assessee&#039;s good faith efforts to rectify the mistake.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:10:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty under section 271(1)(c) unsustainable due to vague notice, inadvertent error in computing book profit, and voluntary correction by the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was ordered to be deleted, emphasizing the necessity of clear charges in penalty proceedings and acknowledging the assessee&#039;s good faith efforts to rectify the mistake.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>