<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1023 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404531</link>
    <description>Retrospective amendment under section 117(1) of the Finance Act, 2019 neutralised service tax on State Government liquor licence fees for the relevant period where the levy was linked to the State&#039;s exclusive privilege and no taxable service or quid pro quo was shown. On that basis, export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, and excise staff salary and overtime charges were treated as non-taxable under reverse charge, while storage licence renewal fee for CO2 was treated separately and remained taxable. Penalties could not survive where the substantive demand was substantially set aside and the dispute turned on interpretation of the levy and the amended position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1023 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404531</link>
      <description>Retrospective amendment under section 117(1) of the Finance Act, 2019 neutralised service tax on State Government liquor licence fees for the relevant period where the levy was linked to the State&#039;s exclusive privilege and no taxable service or quid pro quo was shown. On that basis, export pass fee, import pass fee, permit fee, and excise staff salary and overtime charges were treated as non-taxable under reverse charge, while storage licence renewal fee for CO2 was treated separately and remained taxable. Penalties could not survive where the substantive demand was substantially set aside and the dispute turned on interpretation of the levy and the amended position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>