<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1012 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of a mistake apparent from the record in an Income Tax Appeal. The correction involved the computation of guarantee commissions, specifically adjusting a sentence in the order to accurately reflect the direction. The Tribunal granted relief to the applicant, emphasizing adherence to the arm&#039;s length price principle in transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1012 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of a mistake apparent from the record in an Income Tax Appeal. The correction involved the computation of guarantee commissions, specifically adjusting a sentence in the order to accurately reflect the direction. The Tribunal granted relief to the applicant, emphasizing adherence to the arm&#039;s length price principle in transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>