<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1010 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all counts. The key points were the proper explanation and documentation provided by the assessee, the correct interpretation of Sections 68 and 41(1), and the proportional disallowance of expenses related to the let-out portion of the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1010 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all counts. The key points were the proper explanation and documentation provided by the assessee, the correct interpretation of Sections 68 and 41(1), and the proportional disallowance of expenses related to the let-out portion of the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>