<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1005 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the reference made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 55A was invalid as per the unamended provisions applicable for the assessment year 2012-13. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made under the head &quot;long term capital gains&quot; related to the cost of acquisition substituted by the fair market value as on 01.04.1981. The appeal was thus allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:09:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1005 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the reference made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 55A was invalid as per the unamended provisions applicable for the assessment year 2012-13. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made under the head &quot;long term capital gains&quot; related to the cost of acquisition substituted by the fair market value as on 01.04.1981. The appeal was thus allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>