<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24738</link>
    <description>Interest on securities earmarked against reserve and provident funds was held not to arise from the co-operative bank&#039;s business activity, so it did not qualify for exemption under section 81 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. By contrast, income from commission, exchange and miscellaneous receipts attributable to banking activity was treated as income from banking business and remained exempt under section 81. The controlling test applied was whether the receipt was attributable to an activity normally forming part of banking business; incidental receipts so connected were deductible, while earmarked security interest was not.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 21 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24738</link>
      <description>Interest on securities earmarked against reserve and provident funds was held not to arise from the co-operative bank&#039;s business activity, so it did not qualify for exemption under section 81 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. By contrast, income from commission, exchange and miscellaneous receipts attributable to banking activity was treated as income from banking business and remained exempt under section 81. The controlling test applied was whether the receipt was attributable to an activity normally forming part of banking business; incidental receipts so connected were deductible, while earmarked security interest was not.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>