https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404508 The Disciplinary Committee found that Insolvency Professional Mr. Rajesh Samson did not commit Professional Misconduct for accepting an assignment without a valid Authorization for Assignment (AFA) after a specified date. Despite submitting the AFA application late, his earlier consent to act as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was considered valid. The Disciplinary Committee emphasized the importance of compliance with regulations but ultimately closed the case without further action, as Mr. Samson's actions were deemed acceptable based on the circumstances. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404508 The Disciplinary Committee found that Insolvency Professional Mr. Rajesh Samson did not commit Professional Misconduct for accepting an assignment without a valid Authorization for Assignment (AFA) after a specified date. Despite submitting the AFA application late, his earlier consent to act as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was considered valid. The Disciplinary Committee emphasized the importance of compliance with regulations but ultimately closed the case without further action, as Mr. Samson's actions were deemed acceptable based on the circumstances. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404508