<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 992 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404500</link>
    <description>In a composite turnkey contract, offshore supply receipts were not chargeable to tax in India because the equipment supply was completed outside India, ownership passed on FOB shipment, payment was made outside India, and no material linked that segment to Indian operations of the permanent establishment. By contrast, basic engineering design services and offshore advisory services were taxable in India as business profits attributable to the permanent establishment, since they formed part of the plant-setting project, involved design review and approval for the Indian project, and were rendered through the Indian project set-up. The ruling thus granted partial relief by excluding offshore supply income while sustaining taxability of the service receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 992 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404500</link>
      <description>In a composite turnkey contract, offshore supply receipts were not chargeable to tax in India because the equipment supply was completed outside India, ownership passed on FOB shipment, payment was made outside India, and no material linked that segment to Indian operations of the permanent establishment. By contrast, basic engineering design services and offshore advisory services were taxable in India as business profits attributable to the permanent establishment, since they formed part of the plant-setting project, involved design review and approval for the Indian project, and were rendered through the Indian project set-up. The ruling thus granted partial relief by excluding offshore supply income while sustaining taxability of the service receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>