https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404474 A cheque prosecution could not be quashed under Section 482 CrPC merely on the plea that the underlying debt was time-barred, because the limitation question depended on disputed facts and required trial. A self cheque remained capable of attracting Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the bearer feature was not struck off and the complaint otherwise disclosed a prima facie case. The orders taking cognizance and confirming process were therefore not shown to suffer from legal infirmity, and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404474 A cheque prosecution could not be quashed under Section 482 CrPC merely on the plea that the underlying debt was time-barred, because the limitation question depended on disputed facts and required trial. A self cheque remained capable of attracting Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the bearer feature was not struck off and the complaint otherwise disclosed a prima facie case. The orders taking cognizance and confirming process were therefore not shown to suffer from legal infirmity, and the criminal proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404474