https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404450 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the Appellant and its Directors, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the extended period of limitation could not be repeatedly invoked for the same issue. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the Appellant and invalidated the penalties imposed on the Directors, as the primary demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable due to improper invocation of the extended period of limitation. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404450 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the Appellant and its Directors, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the extended period of limitation could not be repeatedly invoked for the same issue. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the Appellant and invalidated the penalties imposed on the Directors, as the primary demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable due to improper invocation of the extended period of limitation. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404450