https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293675 Disputes under a company petition alleging oppression and mismanagement were treated as referable to arbitration where the claims arose from a Share Purchase Agreement and a Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement containing arbitration clauses and incorporated into the company's articles. The pleadings were found to concern contractual rights and obligations relating to board composition, funding, share allotment, and managerial decisions, and the petitioners were parties to those agreements and had participated in company governance. On that basis, the matter was held amenable to Section 8 referral, and the oppression-and-mismanagement allegations did not take the dispute outside the arbitration clause; the company petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293675 Disputes under a company petition alleging oppression and mismanagement were treated as referable to arbitration where the claims arose from a Share Purchase Agreement and a Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement containing arbitration clauses and incorporated into the company's articles. The pleadings were found to concern contractual rights and obligations relating to board composition, funding, share allotment, and managerial decisions, and the petitioners were parties to those agreements and had participated in company governance. On that basis, the matter was held amenable to Section 8 referral, and the oppression-and-mismanagement allegations did not take the dispute outside the arbitration clause; the company petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293675