<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1857 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293673</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully argued for the allowability of deduction under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act for their residential and commercial building projects. Despite exceeding the specified size limit in some units, judicial precedents supported the proportional allowability of the deduction, emphasizing that the benefit should not be denied entirely. The court upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, citing previous rulings that clarified the deduction loss only applied to units exceeding the prescribed area. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to statutory conditions and relying on judicial precedents in interpreting tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:40:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1857 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293673</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully argued for the allowability of deduction under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act for their residential and commercial building projects. Despite exceeding the specified size limit in some units, judicial precedents supported the proportional allowability of the deduction, emphasizing that the benefit should not be denied entirely. The court upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, citing previous rulings that clarified the deduction loss only applied to units exceeding the prescribed area. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to statutory conditions and relying on judicial precedents in interpreting tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>