https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293682 The court held that the suit was filed on a time-barred debt, and there was no legally enforceable liability for the criminal complaint. Consequently, the plaint in CS.No.75 of 2017 was rejected, and the complaint in C.C.No.5257 of 2016 was quashed. The applications were allowed, and no costs were imposed. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293682 The court held that the suit was filed on a time-barred debt, and there was no legally enforceable liability for the criminal complaint. Consequently, the plaint in CS.No.75 of 2017 was rejected, and the complaint in C.C.No.5257 of 2016 was quashed. The applications were allowed, and no costs were imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293682