https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293681 The court denied the petitioner's application for attachment of immovable properties under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 in a money recovery and deed cancellation suit. The court found insufficient evidence of loan transactions and a lack of prima facie case for an ad interim order. Emphasizing the importance of meeting legal criteria, the court directed the respondents to file an opposition affidavit for further examination. Compliance with procedural requirements and clear evidence were stressed for such a drastic legal remedy, with the case adjourned for additional submissions and comprehensive assessment. en-us Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293681 The court denied the petitioner's application for attachment of immovable properties under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 in a money recovery and deed cancellation suit. The court found insufficient evidence of loan transactions and a lack of prima facie case for an ad interim order. Emphasizing the importance of meeting legal criteria, the court directed the respondents to file an opposition affidavit for further examination. Compliance with procedural requirements and clear evidence were stressed for such a drastic legal remedy, with the case adjourned for additional submissions and comprehensive assessment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293681