https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293663 A representation under Section 11 of COFEPOSA could not be rejected on the ground that the detenu had first to submit to the detention order. The rejecting authority treated submission to detention as a prerequisite, which conflicted with the earlier direction that the representation be considered even before execution of the order. That impermissible basis rendered the rejection unsustainable. In light of the change in law and later decisions referred to in the judgment, the representation required reconsideration on its merits, and the rejection order dated 24.04.2007 was set aside with a direction for fresh consideration by the detaining authority. en-us Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:00:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293663 A representation under Section 11 of COFEPOSA could not be rejected on the ground that the detenu had first to submit to the detention order. The rejecting authority treated submission to detention as a prerequisite, which conflicted with the earlier direction that the representation be considered even before execution of the order. That impermissible basis rendered the rejection unsustainable. In light of the change in law and later decisions referred to in the judgment, the representation required reconsideration on its merits, and the rejection order dated 24.04.2007 was set aside with a direction for fresh consideration by the detaining authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293663