<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 914 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404422</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the preliminary objections raised by the respondents. The court found the petition to be an abuse of the process of law, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s engagement in forum shopping and the repetitive nature of the petitions. In light of this, the court imposed punitive costs of Rs. 10,00,000/- on the petitioner, payable to the Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 914 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404422</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the preliminary objections raised by the respondents. The court found the petition to be an abuse of the process of law, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s engagement in forum shopping and the repetitive nature of the petitions. In light of this, the court imposed punitive costs of Rs. 10,00,000/- on the petitioner, payable to the Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>