https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404406 The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer for all three issues. The Tribunal emphasized that the evidence provided, including banking transactions and consistency with previous assessments, supported the deletions. The Tribunal concluded that the additions were unjustified and should not have been made, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s findings in favor of the assessee. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404406 The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer for all three issues. The Tribunal emphasized that the evidence provided, including banking transactions and consistency with previous assessments, supported the deletions. The Tribunal concluded that the additions were unjustified and should not have been made, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s findings in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404406