https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404400 Civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 requires proof of wilful disobedience or deliberate breach of a tribunal direction; mere non-compliance is not enough unless the conduct is intentional and unjustified. On the facts, the petitioner did not establish that the change in board position was made with the requisite wilful intent to defy the Tribunal's interim orders. The respondents were therefore not found guilty of contempt. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404400 Civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 requires proof of wilful disobedience or deliberate breach of a tribunal direction; mere non-compliance is not enough unless the conduct is intentional and unjustified. On the facts, the petitioner did not establish that the change in board position was made with the requisite wilful intent to defy the Tribunal's interim orders. The respondents were therefore not found guilty of contempt. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404400