<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 891 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404399</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding of a prima facie case and the formation of opinion by the Central Government regarding the Club&#039;s affairs being conducted prejudicially to public interest. The interim relief was modified to suspend the General Committee and appoint an Administrator nominated by the Union of India to manage the Club&#039;s affairs effectively. The decision emphasized the need for adequate relief and directed the suspension of new memberships or fees until waitlist applications were resolved. The ruling focused solely on interim relief and did not delve into the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 891 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404399</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding of a prima facie case and the formation of opinion by the Central Government regarding the Club&#039;s affairs being conducted prejudicially to public interest. The interim relief was modified to suspend the General Committee and appoint an Administrator nominated by the Union of India to manage the Club&#039;s affairs effectively. The decision emphasized the need for adequate relief and directed the suspension of new memberships or fees until waitlist applications were resolved. The ruling focused solely on interim relief and did not delve into the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>