https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404396 The National Company Law Tribunal, Indore Bench, dismissed an application seeking to set aside an ex-parte order under Rule 11 read with Rule 49 of NCLT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal found that despite the Corporate Debtor's claim of non-receipt of notice, the notice had been duly served through publication in newspapers as the Debtor had refused to accept it. The Tribunal clarified that Rule 49(2) applies to matters disposed of summarily, not after due consideration, and relief against such orders should be sought through an appeal to the NCLAT. The application was dismissed, emphasizing the Tribunal's limited power to rectify typographical errors and review orders on merits. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:16:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404396 The National Company Law Tribunal, Indore Bench, dismissed an application seeking to set aside an ex-parte order under Rule 11 read with Rule 49 of NCLT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal found that despite the Corporate Debtor's claim of non-receipt of notice, the notice had been duly served through publication in newspapers as the Debtor had refused to accept it. The Tribunal clarified that Rule 49(2) applies to matters disposed of summarily, not after due consideration, and relief against such orders should be sought through an appeal to the NCLAT. The application was dismissed, emphasizing the Tribunal's limited power to rectify typographical errors and review orders on merits. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404396