<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 883 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404391</link>
    <description>Interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was treated as an accretion to enhanced compensation, not as independent interest income. Because the underlying compensation was exempt under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, the section 28 amount was also held to form part of the exempt compensation and not income chargeable under section 56. The addition as income from other sources was therefore not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 883 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404391</link>
      <description>Interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was treated as an accretion to enhanced compensation, not as independent interest income. Because the underlying compensation was exempt under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, the section 28 amount was also held to form part of the exempt compensation and not income chargeable under section 56. The addition as income from other sources was therefore not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>