<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1649 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) and disallowed expenses under Section 37(1), ruling that the Medical Council of India guidelines do not apply to pharmaceutical companies. It dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the comfort guarantee adjustment, affirming a 1% guarantee fee as the Arm&#039;s Length Price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1649 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) and disallowed expenses under Section 37(1), ruling that the Medical Council of India guidelines do not apply to pharmaceutical companies. It dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the comfort guarantee adjustment, affirming a 1% guarantee fee as the Arm&#039;s Length Price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>