https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293659 The Tribunal allowed the appeal to be withdrawn, granting the Appellants the liberty to raise the issue before the Adjudicating Authority regarding the lack of notice to the Corporate Debtor and the ex-parte nature of the impugned order. The Appellants were permitted to demonstrate that no notice was served on the Corporate Debtor before the impugned order was passed, and the Adjudicating Authority was empowered to review the order if convinced that no notice had been served. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the right to be heard in insolvency proceedings under the I&B Code, ensuring proper notice is served before making impactful decisions. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:10:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293659 The Tribunal allowed the appeal to be withdrawn, granting the Appellants the liberty to raise the issue before the Adjudicating Authority regarding the lack of notice to the Corporate Debtor and the ex-parte nature of the impugned order. The Appellants were permitted to demonstrate that no notice was served on the Corporate Debtor before the impugned order was passed, and the Adjudicating Authority was empowered to review the order if convinced that no notice had been served. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness and the right to be heard in insolvency proceedings under the I&B Code, ensuring proper notice is served before making impactful decisions. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293659