https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293636 The court upheld the trial court and sessions judge's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application for permission to collect evidence for expert analysis in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the petitioner's claim of signature misuse by the complainant, his admission to signing the cheque held him liable. The court emphasized the importance of confronting the complainant with the defense during the trial and found no basis to quash the orders, ultimately dismissing the petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:58:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293636 The court upheld the trial court and sessions judge's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application for permission to collect evidence for expert analysis in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite the petitioner's claim of signature misuse by the complainant, his admission to signing the cheque held him liable. The court emphasized the importance of confronting the complainant with the defense during the trial and found no basis to quash the orders, ultimately dismissing the petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293636