https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293634 Rule 42 of the applicable Pay and Allowances, Leave and Pension Rules is described as permitting full pay, allowances and duty treatment where an employee is honourably acquitted and reinstated; on the facts noted, the acquittal was treated as complete exoneration and the refusal to grant suspension benefits was held unsustainable. The challenge to compulsory retirement was not accepted because the pleadings were inadequate and delay also affected the claim, so that administrative decision was upheld. Rule 28 of the Pension Rules, 1973 required a reasoned basis for pension reduction, and the absence of reasons or demonstrated application of mind rendered a 5% cut unlawful and liable to be set aside. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:13:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293634 Rule 42 of the applicable Pay and Allowances, Leave and Pension Rules is described as permitting full pay, allowances and duty treatment where an employee is honourably acquitted and reinstated; on the facts noted, the acquittal was treated as complete exoneration and the refusal to grant suspension benefits was held unsustainable. The challenge to compulsory retirement was not accepted because the pleadings were inadequate and delay also affected the claim, so that administrative decision was upheld. Rule 28 of the Pension Rules, 1973 required a reasoned basis for pension reduction, and the absence of reasons or demonstrated application of mind rendered a 5% cut unlawful and liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293634