https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404360 The court directed that the petitioner, if interrogated, can have an advocate present at a visible but not audible distance, and the interrogation process should be videographed at the petitioner's expense. The court allowed videography of the interrogation process at the petitioner's cost. As the Principal Commissioner of Customs had addressed the petitioner's concerns regarding interrogation, the court found no need to expedite the investigation, directing the petitioner to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. The court disposed of the writ petition with the given directions. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:10:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404360 The court directed that the petitioner, if interrogated, can have an advocate present at a visible but not audible distance, and the interrogation process should be videographed at the petitioner's expense. The court allowed videography of the interrogation process at the petitioner's cost. As the Principal Commissioner of Customs had addressed the petitioner's concerns regarding interrogation, the court found no need to expedite the investigation, directing the petitioner to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. The court disposed of the writ petition with the given directions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404360