https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404351 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the deactivation of the Director Identification Number (DIN) under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It directed the respondents to reactivate the DIN for use in other companies. The court emphasized that the deactivation was not legally permissible as the grounds for such action were not met under the relevant rules. The court also quashed the premature list of disqualified directors and stated that the reliance on the Condonation of Delay Scheme did not justify the deactivation. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404351 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the deactivation of the Director Identification Number (DIN) under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It directed the respondents to reactivate the DIN for use in other companies. The court emphasized that the deactivation was not legally permissible as the grounds for such action were not met under the relevant rules. The court also quashed the premature list of disqualified directors and stated that the reliance on the Condonation of Delay Scheme did not justify the deactivation. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404351