<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 841 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and concealment of material facts. The appeal was dismissed due to inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the second corrigendum and found no violation of natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 841 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and concealment of material facts. The appeal was dismissed due to inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the second corrigendum and found no violation of natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>