https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404346 In a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the anti-profiteering provisions and connected rules, the Delhi HC dealt only with interim relief. It declined to confine protection from recovery to the amount computed for one product category, noting earlier orders in similar matters. Interim stay of recovery was granted, but only on the condition that the petitioner deposit the entire principal profiteered amount, excluding GST already deposited, in equal monthly instalments within the time allowed. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404346 In a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the anti-profiteering provisions and connected rules, the Delhi HC dealt only with interim relief. It declined to confine protection from recovery to the amount computed for one product category, noting earlier orders in similar matters. Interim stay of recovery was granted, but only on the condition that the petitioner deposit the entire principal profiteered amount, excluding GST already deposited, in equal monthly instalments within the time allowed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404346