<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the issues of patent expenses and bogus purchases back to the Assessing Officer for proper verification and computation, while allowing the full claim under Section 35(2AB). The decision emphasized the importance of accurate classification and verification of expenses and deductions as per statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the issues of patent expenses and bogus purchases back to the Assessing Officer for proper verification and computation, while allowing the full claim under Section 35(2AB). The decision emphasized the importance of accurate classification and verification of expenses and deductions as per statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>