<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404338</link>
    <description>In an NDPS bail matter involving alleged commercial quantity, the Court treated the sampling process as legally suspect because the prosecution mixed contents of separate packets before drawing representative samples, rather than preserving packet-wise recovery. That irregularity cast doubt on the prosecution evidence. The Court also noted the petitioner&#039;s prolonged custody, absence of recovery from his person, and no material showing habitual offending or likely misuse of liberty, and found the statutory bail restrictions under Section 37 satisfied. Bail was therefore held justified, and the petitioner was directed to be released on conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 830 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404338</link>
      <description>In an NDPS bail matter involving alleged commercial quantity, the Court treated the sampling process as legally suspect because the prosecution mixed contents of separate packets before drawing representative samples, rather than preserving packet-wise recovery. That irregularity cast doubt on the prosecution evidence. The Court also noted the petitioner&#039;s prolonged custody, absence of recovery from his person, and no material showing habitual offending or likely misuse of liberty, and found the statutory bail restrictions under Section 37 satisfied. Bail was therefore held justified, and the petitioner was directed to be released on conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>