<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 824 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, affirming the Impugned Order admitting the Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It held there was no &#039;Pre-Existing Dispute&#039;, validated the Operational Creditor&#039;s invoices as compliant with the Solar Power Purchase Agreement, and rejected the intervention application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 824 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, affirming the Impugned Order admitting the Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It held there was no &#039;Pre-Existing Dispute&#039;, validated the Operational Creditor&#039;s invoices as compliant with the Solar Power Purchase Agreement, and rejected the intervention application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>