https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404327 The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the appropriate authority within four weeks, citing the grievance regarding non-reimbursement of the differential tax amount due to the transition from VAT to GST in works contracts. The authority was instructed to consider and dispose of the representation following revised guidelines by the Finance Department of the Government of Odisha by 31st March 2021. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the authority's decision if dissatisfied, and no coercive action against the petitioner was permitted until the specified date. The writ petition was disposed of, offering a resolution pathway for the petitioner to address the tax reimbursement issue effectively. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404327 The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the appropriate authority within four weeks, citing the grievance regarding non-reimbursement of the differential tax amount due to the transition from VAT to GST in works contracts. The authority was instructed to consider and dispose of the representation following revised guidelines by the Finance Department of the Government of Odisha by 31st March 2021. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the authority's decision if dissatisfied, and no coercive action against the petitioner was permitted until the specified date. The writ petition was disposed of, offering a resolution pathway for the petitioner to address the tax reimbursement issue effectively. Case-Laws GST Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404327