<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 884 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293605</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized preventing repetitive deductions on the same profit under different provisions, directing the matter back to the assessing officer for verification in line with the Special Bench ruling. The order was pronounced on 30-6-2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 884 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293605</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized preventing repetitive deductions on the same profit under different provisions, directing the matter back to the assessing officer for verification in line with the Special Bench ruling. The order was pronounced on 30-6-2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>