https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404318 The Court directed the case for further consideration on 3rd March 2021, instructing the petitioner to cooperate with the adjudication process regarding the challenged show-cause notices. Additionally, any adjudication order concerning the petitioner is prohibited from publication or communication without the Court's authorization. The respondent nos. 2 and 3 defended the validity of the notices, arguing that the issuing officer was duly authorized, empowered, and had the necessary jurisdiction. They contended that challenging such notices in writ jurisdiction is impermissible, citing relevant judgments to support their position. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:08:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404318 The Court directed the case for further consideration on 3rd March 2021, instructing the petitioner to cooperate with the adjudication process regarding the challenged show-cause notices. Additionally, any adjudication order concerning the petitioner is prohibited from publication or communication without the Court's authorization. The respondent nos. 2 and 3 defended the validity of the notices, arguing that the issuing officer was duly authorized, empowered, and had the necessary jurisdiction. They contended that challenging such notices in writ jurisdiction is impermissible, citing relevant judgments to support their position. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404318