<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 757 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404265</link>
    <description>The court clarified that the payments made by a company to a shareholder, adjusted with a security deposit, were deemed a commercial transaction, not a loan under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that these transactions were commercial in nature and not subject to taxation. The appeal was allowed in favor of the shareholder, overturning the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 757 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404265</link>
      <description>The court clarified that the payments made by a company to a shareholder, adjusted with a security deposit, were deemed a commercial transaction, not a loan under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that these transactions were commercial in nature and not subject to taxation. The appeal was allowed in favor of the shareholder, overturning the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>