<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 756 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404264</link>
    <description>The High Court focused on the limitation issue concerning the block assessment order for the years in question, directing the tribunal to reevaluate it. Other issues such as excess depreciation, asset valuation for depreciation, and impact on lease rentals were not extensively discussed due to the limitation issue taking precedence post-remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 756 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404264</link>
      <description>The High Court focused on the limitation issue concerning the block assessment order for the years in question, directing the tribunal to reevaluate it. Other issues such as excess depreciation, asset valuation for depreciation, and impact on lease rentals were not extensively discussed due to the limitation issue taking precedence post-remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>