<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 753 - GUAJART HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404261</link>
    <description>Questions arose over whether proceedings concerning the companies&#039; assets were pending before the NCLT and, if not, whether the High Court could refer the parties&#039; claims and related questions of law and fact to that Tribunal. The matter was considered against the background of secured creditor recovery action, prior winding-up and sale of assets, and the asserted effect of the insolvency framework, including alleged abatement under the repeal and amendment provisions governing sick industrial companies. No final view was taken on the abatement issue or on the power of referral; further submissions were called for on the pending status of proceedings and the Court&#039;s reference jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:37:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 753 - GUAJART HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404261</link>
      <description>Questions arose over whether proceedings concerning the companies&#039; assets were pending before the NCLT and, if not, whether the High Court could refer the parties&#039; claims and related questions of law and fact to that Tribunal. The matter was considered against the background of secured creditor recovery action, prior winding-up and sale of assets, and the asserted effect of the insolvency framework, including alleged abatement under the repeal and amendment provisions governing sick industrial companies. No final view was taken on the abatement issue or on the power of referral; further submissions were called for on the pending status of proceedings and the Court&#039;s reference jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>