<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 731 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in quashing the reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2010-2011. The reassessment initiated beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year was deemed invalid due to being a mere change of opinion, as the assessee had duly disclosed all material facts during the original assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue regarding the undervaluation of closing inventory and gross profit percentage discrepancy, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the additions made by the AO were unsustainable due to lack of contrary evidence from the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 731 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in quashing the reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2010-2011. The reassessment initiated beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year was deemed invalid due to being a mere change of opinion, as the assessee had duly disclosed all material facts during the original assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue regarding the undervaluation of closing inventory and gross profit percentage discrepancy, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the additions made by the AO were unsustainable due to lack of contrary evidence from the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>