<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 724 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject the application under Section 9 of the IBC due to the existence of a genuine pre-existing dispute between the parties. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the IBC is not meant for debt recovery but for insolvency resolution, and should not be misused to recover disputed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 724 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject the application under Section 9 of the IBC due to the existence of a genuine pre-existing dispute between the parties. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the IBC is not meant for debt recovery but for insolvency resolution, and should not be misused to recover disputed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>