<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 723 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and directed a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for a hearing without influence from the previous order. The appeal was allowed based on identified errors, including violations of natural justice, inadmissibility of Cenvat credit, and errors in reproducing the High Court&#039;s order, warranting a proper reconsideration of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:36:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 723 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and directed a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for a hearing without influence from the previous order. The appeal was allowed based on identified errors, including violations of natural justice, inadmissibility of Cenvat credit, and errors in reproducing the High Court&#039;s order, warranting a proper reconsideration of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>