<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 717 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the option price received by the assessee is a capital receipt to be adjusted at the time of transfer of shares and not taxable in the year of receipt. The joint-venture agreement is a shareholder agreement, and the principle of consistency applies, maintaining the treatment of option price as a capital receipt. The decision in Mahindra Telecommunications was found to be inapplicable to the present case. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 717 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the option price received by the assessee is a capital receipt to be adjusted at the time of transfer of shares and not taxable in the year of receipt. The joint-venture agreement is a shareholder agreement, and the principle of consistency applies, maintaining the treatment of option price as a capital receipt. The decision in Mahindra Telecommunications was found to be inapplicable to the present case. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>