<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 706 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It was held that the Assessing Officer cannot estimate income without rejecting the books of account or having material evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of collecting taxes based on legitimate evidence rather than solely on admissions or guesswork. The admission of additional income by the assessee was deemed invalid as it was made under pressure and misunderstanding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 706 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections. It was held that the Assessing Officer cannot estimate income without rejecting the books of account or having material evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of collecting taxes based on legitimate evidence rather than solely on admissions or guesswork. The admission of additional income by the assessee was deemed invalid as it was made under pressure and misunderstanding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>