https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404213 The appellants were found to have intentionally avoided payment of CGST/SGST, failed to maintain proper records, and did not file required returns. The excess/unaccounted stock of perfume/compound was seized and confiscated under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017. Penalties were imposed on the appellants and the Director. The authority rejected the appellants' arguments, upholding the impugned order and finding no issues with the adjudication process. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404213 The appellants were found to have intentionally avoided payment of CGST/SGST, failed to maintain proper records, and did not file required returns. The excess/unaccounted stock of perfume/compound was seized and confiscated under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017. Penalties were imposed on the appellants and the Director. The authority rejected the appellants' arguments, upholding the impugned order and finding no issues with the adjudication process. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404213